Page | 34
Conclusions
As you can see vShield is very easy to setup and configure – and by relocating
the functions of AV out of the guest operating system it affords for great control
over the impact of this process. Remember though that vShield itself is not
“free”. You need resources to run each of the appliances (SVA) as well at the
two or more management consoles. We estimate that you would need to get
significant density of VMs to ESX host to both offset the license and resource
costs when compared to traditional methods of managing AV. Consider also that
introducing new method of AV is yet another set of changes on what be already
a radical departure from the existing model of delivering desktops.
Finally, you might want to review your current methods for patching and
updating ESX hosts. As you might recall the virtual appliances that make up a
vShield deployment are patch to “internal” standard switches on each hosts. Any
VM configured to such a type of vSwitch is not open for vMotion. So if you used
to using VMware’s Update Manager to automatically remediate host then
maintenance mode with fully automated DRS cluster will not work as expected.
You will find maintenance mode will get “stuck” at 2% because vMotion cannot
move the SVA to another host. The simplest way to deal with this is shutdown
the SVA once all the other VMs have been migrated to other ESX hosts in the
cluster. Do not be tempted to power down the SVA prior to carrying out
maintenance mode, as this will leave your VMs in an unprotected state. If the
SVA is powered down before the VMs it’s protecting then technically they are in
Commenti su questo manuale